Warning: Undefined variable $time_difference in /home4/hpvcxhmy/public_html/wp-content/plugins/similarity/similarity.php on line 324
Warning: Undefined array key 0 in /home4/hpvcxhmy/public_html/wp-content/plugins/similarity/similarity.php on line 336
Warning: Undefined variable $time_difference in /home4/hpvcxhmy/public_html/wp-content/plugins/similarity/similarity.php on line 324
Warning: Undefined array key 0 in /home4/hpvcxhmy/public_html/wp-content/plugins/similarity/similarity.php on line 336
It’s easy to find people describing the moral argument against government run social programs (forced charity encourages selfishness) but I don’t think I’ve ever heard a more compelling logical argument for the negative consequences of substituting an institutional approach to a problem for a solution based on individual initiative than this one.
With no hint of bias in his tale, Scott relates his observations of the changes that took place as a charitable action by some individuals employees at the IRS to help one of their co-workers became institutionalized. Soon employees began to actively opt out of participating inbecause of the changes that came from trying to make the program fair for everyone.
- Right Thinking (1.000)
- Dependence vs Liberty (1.000)
- Sunsets for Subsidies (1.000)
- Heights of Public Discourse (1.000)
- Glancing at Immigration (1.000)
- Who Are You Voting Against? (RANDOM - 0.500)