<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Historical Doldrums</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.davidjmiller.org/2008/historical-doldrums/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.davidjmiller.org/2008/historical-doldrums/</link>
	<description>Recording Bits and Pieces of Heaven in Theory and Practice</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 17:53:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Miller » Blog Archive &#187; Politics and Marriage</title>
		<link>http://www.davidjmiller.org/2008/historical-doldrums/comment-page-1/#comment-6891</link>
		<dc:creator>David Miller » Blog Archive &#187; Politics and Marriage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 22:06:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidjmiller.org/historical-doldrums/#comment-6891</guid>
		<description>[...] was invited to share my views on political issues relating to marriage and was pointed to DefendMarriage.org as a reference [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] was invited to share my views on political issues relating to marriage and was pointed to DefendMarriage.org as a reference [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.davidjmiller.org/2008/historical-doldrums/comment-page-1/#comment-6866</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 21:43:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidjmiller.org/historical-doldrums/#comment-6866</guid>
		<description>JP,

Thanks for that background. I had believed that the Mayflower compact was important to our history, but when I read it I couldn&#039;t see anything of unique value there. Knowing more of the details of the context in which it was written I am better able to see what an important precedent it set in our history.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JP,</p>
<p>Thanks for that background. I had believed that the Mayflower compact was important to our history, but when I read it I couldn&#8217;t see anything of unique value there. Knowing more of the details of the context in which it was written I am better able to see what an important precedent it set in our history.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JP</title>
		<link>http://www.davidjmiller.org/2008/historical-doldrums/comment-page-1/#comment-6865</link>
		<dc:creator>JP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 19:27:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidjmiller.org/historical-doldrums/#comment-6865</guid>
		<description>So I couldn&#039;t help but want to respond to this post.  I was a history major at BYU-Idaho and I focused a lot on the colonial period of American history.  I also tutored American Heritage.  All this is being said so I can let you know that the Mayflower Compact was of greater importance than you think.  I can give you a quick history lesson, and for more you can see this website. (http://www.crf-usa.org/Foundation_docs/Foundation_lesson_mayflower.html)  Here is the deal. The Mayflower was split half being pilgrims and half strangers or non-pilgrims.  The strangers realized that the ship had not landed in British territory (the domain of the Virginia Company) so there was a near mutiny.  The people on the ship knew a government was needed and knew that royal authority would not save them.  When they say that “in the Presence of God and one another, covenant and combine ourselves together into a civil Body Politick, for our better Ordering and Preservation, and Furtherance” they create one of the worlds first modern self governments.  Further the abundance of religious terminology establishes a pattern for the Puritan New England temperament which defines early American personality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So I couldn&#8217;t help but want to respond to this post.  I was a history major at BYU-Idaho and I focused a lot on the colonial period of American history.  I also tutored American Heritage.  All this is being said so I can let you know that the Mayflower Compact was of greater importance than you think.  I can give you a quick history lesson, and for more you can see this website. (<a href="http://www.crf-usa.org/Foundation_docs/Foundation_lesson_mayflower.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.crf-usa.org/Foundation_docs/Foundation_lesson_mayflower.html</a>)  Here is the deal. The Mayflower was split half being pilgrims and half strangers or non-pilgrims.  The strangers realized that the ship had not landed in British territory (the domain of the Virginia Company) so there was a near mutiny.  The people on the ship knew a government was needed and knew that royal authority would not save them.  When they say that “in the Presence of God and one another, covenant and combine ourselves together into a civil Body Politick, for our better Ordering and Preservation, and Furtherance” they create one of the worlds first modern self governments.  Further the abundance of religious terminology establishes a pattern for the Puritan New England temperament which defines early American personality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.davidjmiller.org/2008/historical-doldrums/comment-page-1/#comment-6854</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 20:24:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidjmiller.org/historical-doldrums/#comment-6854</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re right, that does not relate to this post, but I&#039;ll look at defendmarriage.org and I might post my reactions this weekend.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re right, that does not relate to this post, but I&#8217;ll look at defendmarriage.org and I might post my reactions this weekend.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Melissa</title>
		<link>http://www.davidjmiller.org/2008/historical-doldrums/comment-page-1/#comment-6852</link>
		<dc:creator>Melissa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 19:53:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidjmiller.org/historical-doldrums/#comment-6852</guid>
		<description>Although this is not related to your posting, I wonder if you would be interested in seeing/posting about/reflecting on some political information related to the traditional family.  The website is www.defendmarriage.org and they have an e-mail list there (that you can subscribe to) to keep current on legislation in various states about abortion rights, traditional families, gay rights, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although this is not related to your posting, I wonder if you would be interested in seeing/posting about/reflecting on some political information related to the traditional family.  The website is <a href="http://www.defendmarriage.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.defendmarriage.org</a> and they have an e-mail list there (that you can subscribe to) to keep current on legislation in various states about abortion rights, traditional families, gay rights, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
