<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Political Conundrum</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.davidjmiller.org/2007/political-conundrum/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.davidjmiller.org/2007/political-conundrum/</link>
	<description>Recording Bits and Pieces of Heaven in Theory and Practice</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 20:18:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.davidjmiller.org/2007/political-conundrum/comment-page-1/#comment-2417</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 14:22:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidjmiller.org/political-conundrum/#comment-2417</guid>
		<description>Thanks for sharing Misty.

What topic do you see Mike Gravel bringing to the table? All the coverage I hear about him is how unconventional his campaign is.

What do you think the Democrats gain if they nominate someone other than Hillary? (I ask this considering that Republicans are not very enthusiastic about their choices, but they are generally quite set in their opposition to Senator Clinton.)

Also, do you have any thoughts (as a Democrat) on the possible candidacy of Newt Gingrich?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for sharing Misty.</p>
<p>What topic do you see Mike Gravel bringing to the table? All the coverage I hear about him is how unconventional his campaign is.</p>
<p>What do you think the Democrats gain if they nominate someone other than Hillary? (I ask this considering that Republicans are not very enthusiastic about their choices, but they are generally quite set in their opposition to Senator Clinton.)</p>
<p>Also, do you have any thoughts (as a Democrat) on the possible candidacy of Newt Gingrich?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Misty Fowler</title>
		<link>http://www.davidjmiller.org/2007/political-conundrum/comment-page-1/#comment-2402</link>
		<dc:creator>Misty Fowler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 05:49:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidjmiller.org/political-conundrum/#comment-2402</guid>
		<description>David, to answer your question - almost all of the Dems I have talked to are very comfortable with almost all of their choices for nominee. Some (like me) aren&#039;t comfortable with Hillary, but (with her as an exception for some) I think that most of us would be happy to vote in the General Election for any of them.

I&#039;m all for Obama, of course, but I don&#039;t think that Edwards or Dodd would be bad for our country. Even Richardson would be ok, but I&#039;d really like to see him as Secretary of State because his skills really match up to our country&#039;s needs for that position.

I don&#039;t really consider the rest of the candidates as having a shot, and when I initially considered them, none of them thrilled me. But each of them have a topic they&#039;re bringing to the table, and fostering discussion, so I think it&#039;s good they&#039;re running, at least.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David, to answer your question &#8211; almost all of the Dems I have talked to are very comfortable with almost all of their choices for nominee. Some (like me) aren&#8217;t comfortable with Hillary, but (with her as an exception for some) I think that most of us would be happy to vote in the General Election for any of them.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m all for Obama, of course, but I don&#8217;t think that Edwards or Dodd would be bad for our country. Even Richardson would be ok, but I&#8217;d really like to see him as Secretary of State because his skills really match up to our country&#8217;s needs for that position.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t really consider the rest of the candidates as having a shot, and when I initially considered them, none of them thrilled me. But each of them have a topic they&#8217;re bringing to the table, and fostering discussion, so I think it&#8217;s good they&#8217;re running, at least.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.davidjmiller.org/2007/political-conundrum/comment-page-1/#comment-2398</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 03:56:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidjmiller.org/political-conundrum/#comment-2398</guid>
		<description>Of course I can only vote for one in the primaries - and I have no control over who the eventual nominee will chose for a running mate . . .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course I can only vote for one in the primaries &#8211; and I have no control over who the eventual nominee will chose for a running mate . . .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hyrum</title>
		<link>http://www.davidjmiller.org/2007/political-conundrum/comment-page-1/#comment-2395</link>
		<dc:creator>Hyrum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 01:51:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidjmiller.org/political-conundrum/#comment-2395</guid>
		<description>Simple answer.  Romney-Huckabee.  Slogans: Vote for the E&#039;s, Go E&#039;sy, &#039;E&#039;s my man!  ad nauseum.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Simple answer.  Romney-Huckabee.  Slogans: Vote for the E&#8217;s, Go E&#8217;sy, &#8216;E&#8217;s my man!  ad nauseum.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.davidjmiller.org/2007/political-conundrum/comment-page-1/#comment-2362</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 21:18:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidjmiller.org/political-conundrum/#comment-2362</guid>
		<description>I take it as a compliment that my writing has influenced you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I take it as a compliment that my writing has influenced you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy</title>
		<link>http://www.davidjmiller.org/2007/political-conundrum/comment-page-1/#comment-2361</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 21:13:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidjmiller.org/political-conundrum/#comment-2361</guid>
		<description>Fair enough.  I&#039;ll admit that I&#039;ve been influenced by some of what you published so maybe you have a good point!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fair enough.  I&#8217;ll admit that I&#8217;ve been influenced by some of what you published so maybe you have a good point!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.davidjmiller.org/2007/political-conundrum/comment-page-1/#comment-2359</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 21:10:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidjmiller.org/political-conundrum/#comment-2359</guid>
		<description>My vote is not the only thing at stake here. However small it may be, there is also the issue of my influence as a politically active person.

How the candidates fare in the race is not determined by how much money they spend but by what people think of them. The money is spent in an effort to influence the perceptions of the voters but the perceptions of the voters is also swayed by polls - which generally target politically active adults. Perception is swayed by the tone of public discussion about the candidate. Those who are active in the public discussion set that tone and it can alter the tone of the media coverage for that candidate.That tone of conversation and the relative levels of enthusiasm for any given candidate affect the amount of money they can raise to spend in their efforts to influence voters.

Though my personal influence is not large the issue is a serious one, especially as my influence is likely to grow over time as I increase my political activity in the future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My vote is not the only thing at stake here. However small it may be, there is also the issue of my influence as a politically active person.</p>
<p>How the candidates fare in the race is not determined by how much money they spend but by what people think of them. The money is spent in an effort to influence the perceptions of the voters but the perceptions of the voters is also swayed by polls &#8211; which generally target politically active adults. Perception is swayed by the tone of public discussion about the candidate. Those who are active in the public discussion set that tone and it can alter the tone of the media coverage for that candidate.That tone of conversation and the relative levels of enthusiasm for any given candidate affect the amount of money they can raise to spend in their efforts to influence voters.</p>
<p>Though my personal influence is not large the issue is a serious one, especially as my influence is likely to grow over time as I increase my political activity in the future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy</title>
		<link>http://www.davidjmiller.org/2007/political-conundrum/comment-page-1/#comment-2356</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 20:08:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidjmiller.org/political-conundrum/#comment-2356</guid>
		<description>I wonder why you consider this a conundrum.  

You vote doesn&#039;t matter.  

Vote for Huckabee if you think that’s right but in the end Utah&#039;s Republicans will go for Romney in the primary unless he commits a huge moral indiscretion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder why you consider this a conundrum.  </p>
<p>You vote doesn&#8217;t matter.  </p>
<p>Vote for Huckabee if you think that’s right but in the end Utah&#8217;s Republicans will go for Romney in the primary unless he commits a huge moral indiscretion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.davidjmiller.org/2007/political-conundrum/comment-page-1/#comment-2354</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 18:33:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidjmiller.org/political-conundrum/#comment-2354</guid>
		<description>I would not have said that Southern Baptists believed that they have a birthright to this country - I would have said Protestants - but you might be right, it might be strongest among Southern Baptists.

As for Joe Biden - he&#039;s one of my favorites among the remaining Democrats (My favorite was easily Tom Vilsack, but he&#039;s out now). In some ways Biden is like Huckabee - he&#039;s a candidate who deserves more media coverage and a better shot at the nomination than he&#039;s likely to get.

Thanks for sharing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would not have said that Southern Baptists believed that they have a birthright to this country &#8211; I would have said Protestants &#8211; but you might be right, it might be strongest among Southern Baptists.</p>
<p>As for Joe Biden &#8211; he&#8217;s one of my favorites among the remaining Democrats (My favorite was easily Tom Vilsack, but he&#8217;s out now). In some ways Biden is like Huckabee &#8211; he&#8217;s a candidate who deserves more media coverage and a better shot at the nomination than he&#8217;s likely to get.</p>
<p>Thanks for sharing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Obi wan liberali</title>
		<link>http://www.davidjmiller.org/2007/political-conundrum/comment-page-1/#comment-2353</link>
		<dc:creator>Obi wan liberali</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 18:22:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidjmiller.org/political-conundrum/#comment-2353</guid>
		<description>I can only speak for myself.  I think Obama has some appeal though I wonder about his lack of experience.  I personally support Biden but recognize that he is a long shot.  

I think Huckabee has a very conservative record and he is obviously proud of that fact.  I don&#039;t see him as a uniter, but as a divider in an already divisive country.  

Obviously, I recognize that someone who has religious beliefs will end up in the white house, whether it is Hillary, Mitt or Huckabee.   Southern Baptists I know believe in the hearts that they have more of a birthright to this country than those they disagree with.  I disagree with that perspective.  But as you know, I&#039;m not generally siding with the majority.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can only speak for myself.  I think Obama has some appeal though I wonder about his lack of experience.  I personally support Biden but recognize that he is a long shot.  </p>
<p>I think Huckabee has a very conservative record and he is obviously proud of that fact.  I don&#8217;t see him as a uniter, but as a divider in an already divisive country.  </p>
<p>Obviously, I recognize that someone who has religious beliefs will end up in the white house, whether it is Hillary, Mitt or Huckabee.   Southern Baptists I know believe in the hearts that they have more of a birthright to this country than those they disagree with.  I disagree with that perspective.  But as you know, I&#8217;m not generally siding with the majority.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

